jump to navigation

Thoughts 7/29/2007 July 29, 2007

Posted by Kelsey Martineau in Philosophy, Psychology.
Tags: ,
4 comments

The butterfly effect theory is something I’ve posted on a time or two, but I want to do an in-depth post on it.  I honestly don’t think that people realize just how much one single event in your life plays a part.  I think that most people sit back and just do things spastically, without considering consequences, outcomes, or the future.  I mean, I’ll be honest, it has happened to me.  I like to try not to regret, but sometimes you can’t help it.  Sometimes you cannot help yourself but to look back at something that you have done, and say, “Why in the world did I do that?”  I love the statement that “Hindsight is 20/20″ What a brilliant statement.  So many of my previous posts tie into this one.  For an example, the post on willpower a while back.  It blows my mind to compare my current mood and mental state, as well as what I’m going through in my life, compared to then.  Honestly not much has changed since then, but I remember what I was going through in my life when I posted that, and it wasn’t a pleasant experience.

I guess the main problem with humans is that, overall we are not only stupid, but behave illogically.  Everyone has at least heard of Spock from Star Trek.  Well, he always said that humans were “illogical.”  Can you disagree with him?  I’ve noticed something lately.  People hate when they are told that they have changed.  I told someone a while back that she “Wasn’t the person that they used to be.”  And she hated that so much!  Is it more because people fear change, or because they want to display a constant persona?  In my opinion it’s a little bit of both.  But I think it’s more the former.  I believe that when someone is told that they are different, they automatically assume it’s for the worst.  Well, in most cases it is, but not always.

I also wonder how sincere the human race is capable of being.  Of course some more than others, nevertheless are we sometimes deceived by sincerity?  I think so, most definitely.  I believe that the condition of the situation has an enormous effect on how someone treats you.  For an example you’re dating someone, and that person treats you with the utmost respect.  If you observe them treat other people the same way they treat you while you are dating, then their sincerity is authentic.  That brings to mind an awesome quote by a man named Samuel Johnson

The true measure of a man is how he treats someone who can do him absolutely no good.

Thoughts 7/19/2007 July 19, 2007

Posted by Kelsey Martineau in Philosophy, Religion.
Tags: ,
5 comments

*Suggested Topic by Bryan*

The suggested topic was:

The possibility of existence without purpose. Is it problematic for us as humans have no pre-ordained purpose in life?

This was an excellent suggested topic by Bryan.   I will go ahead and say out in the open, yes, I believe so.  I think that religion gives most people their purpose.  I mean, let’s be honest, if there weren’t religions that kept people straight, would the law be enough?  Definitely not.  As Marx said, religion is the opium of the people.  I don’t think religion gives everyone their purpose, but you also have to remember that statistically, atheists are more likely to be murderers than those with a chosen religion.

Regardless of whether or not we believe in destiny, we can still believe in a purpose for our life.  Don’t get me wrong, the two sometimes go hand in hand, but human beings have the ability to create purpose for their life, even if they don’t believe there is a pre-ordained calling on your life.  I know from experience, that the worst times of my life have been when I felt that I was stagnant, and unable to make a difference.  However, I don’t know if that is simply my outlook on life, or everyone feels that way?  I think to an extent, everyone feels like they need to make a difference in the world, even if it’s a small one.  Everyone in their life has at least one event where they were the “hero” so to speak, and that always feels really good.  Why does it feel good?  Because we feel like we made a difference.  We feel like we changed a life, or helped someone.  That demonstrates the need for purpose in our life.

I am reminded of the quote from Agent Smith from The Matrix Reloaded:

We are not here because we are free; we are here because we are not free. There is no denying purpose, because as we both know without purpose, we would not exist. It is purpose that created us. Purpose that connects us. Purpose that pulls us, that guides us, that drives us. It is purpose that defines, purpose that binds us.

I know I refer to The Matrix series quite a bit, but it’s a very good reference point for a lot of my statements.  Look at what Smith said, it is purpose that drives us, that connects us, etc…  He even goes to saying that without purpose we would not exist.  Does feeling as we have a purpose responsible for our creation?  Let’s break it down a little.  Think about your own life.  Do you want to get married, have children, and raise them?  If the answer is yes, then you have purpose in your life.  It’s just like Smith said; we would cease to exist without purpose.

Thoughts 7/7/2007 July 7, 2007

Posted by Kelsey Martineau in Psychology, Religion.
Tags: ,
add a comment

You know what my favorite thing about life is?  The fact that it’s basically one big puzzle.  I mean think about it; every single thing that we experience in life, for the most part, has to be figured out.  I’m not using that old saying of “all the pieces in life eventually fit together.”  That statement may be true, but that isn’t what I’m talking about.  I’m referring to situations we experience.  Ever had an event that you experienced simply not add up?  At some point in our life, we all have I think.  So how we react to that particular situation defines us.  We have the ability in life to react to situations however we want.  We may not have control over many things in life, but we can react in any way.

The consistancy of Christianity has been on my mind for the last two weeks.  Actually, that statement works even if you aren’t a Christian.  The reason I use Christianity, is because I am one, but as stated probably hundreds of times before in this blog, I do not hate you if you aren’t.  What would that make me, as a Christian look like?  To stray off of my main point for a second, let’s think about that.  Christians sometimes have a bad reputation, and I’ll tell you exactly why; It’s because sometimes, some of these churches want to cast people into hell.  Now before jumping to conclusion, think about that statement.  I’ve been to churches where it’s almost like the congregation is ready to cast people into Hell, because they feel like they deserve it.  But that simply isn’t what the Church, or Christianity as a whole is all about.  It’s not about condemning people; It’s about bringing people to God.  Now, to get back on topic, we were talking about the consistency of your religious walk.  It can be applied to almost any religion out there.  The consistency of what you believe is what defines you as a human being.  If I talk one way, and act another, people will see that.  If I claim to be a Christian, and go out and get drunk, carouse, etc… that is not remaining true to what I preach or believe, and I think that’s a very important part of spirituality.  Granted, our walk with God, or the deity you choose to believe in, is much more important.

Christianity is not a synonym for perfection.  I read that on someones myspace profile the other day, and that single statement meant so much to me.  The world though, doesn’t see it that way.  For some reason, people have attained the concept that if you are a Christian, that you are supposed to be perfect.  People loved it when they heard about Mel Gibson getting drunk.  I heard about it for weeks, and every time someone would mention it to me, I’d just respond with, “Well, he’s not Jesus, yes he created and directed The Passion of The Christ, but he isn’t perfect.”  It comes back to Jesus’ statement about “He who is without sin cast the first stone.”

I think in life our main purpose should be to not only stand firm in what we believe, but if we’re truly passionate about it, share it.  If you read this, and are a Muslim, and email me or comment disagreeing with me on anything, I’m not going to cast you down.  I’m going to tell you that I respect what you believe.  I have an enormous amount of respect for people that stand up for what they believe in.  I always have, and I guess it’s because of how the rest of the world is.

Lost Character Personalities – Part 24 of 24 – Benjamin Linus July 7, 2007

Posted by Kelsey Martineau in Lost Character Analysis.
Tags: ,
2 comments

Benjamin Linus.  Every single person that reads this analysis will agree with the statement that Ben is a manipulator to the core.  Probably one of the most brilliant minds you will find on the island.  Simply because he’s brilliant doesn’t mean he’s not evil.  Evil seems to be very dependent on your point of view on many things.  Ben refers to himself and the rest of the “others” as the good guys, but that doesn’t necessarily mean he’s right.  Good guys don’t kidnap people, run tests on children, and manipulate people to reach your own goals.  That’s a trait of an evil person.

We see Ben’s childhood, something that we don’t get to see for a lot of the other people on the island.  Seeing someone as a child explains many, many things about their life.  I can honestly say, seeing how Ben grew up, I understand why he is how he is.  Ben lacked a father figure; although he had a father, he wasn’t a good one.  I think that’s a very important thing in life.  We have to feel accepted in this world, and Ben unfortunately missed out on that.  Ben killed his dad, and felt it was greatly justified.  He didn’t even bury the body, which is unbelievable.

Ben is a genius.  He knows how to get exactly what he wants from not only people he knows very well, but also people that he doesn’t know very well, such as Jack, Locke, and many others.  He’s a skilled liar, as we see in Season two.  Remember when he claimed he was “Henry Gale.”  Most of the information about the balloon, where he was from, among a lot of other stuff, was created on the fly I’m sure.  It takes an extremely intelligent person to pull off something like that, and Ben did it with ease.  Ben is able to think on the fly in situations, such as we saw in the Season three finale, when informing his men to kill Sayid, Jin, and Bernard if he didn’t hear him within one minute.  That was simply a brilliant on-the-fly decision.

Although he’s a scoundrel sometimes, he at least has class.  We see some manners shine through, for example eating breakfast with Kate, and being courteous the entire time.  I guess sometimes it seems like his personality conflicts with itself.  We see his courtesy, but then at other times we see the exact opposite.  We can learn from Ben that a skilled manipulator can get what he wants when he wants it.  In fact, when I hear the name Benjamin Linus, I think manipulation.  We can also learn that a father figure is important in life.  Although Ben seems to get what he wants most of the time, it doesn’t seem that he is always happy, which is something that we have all been through at some point in life.

Lost Character Personalities – Part 23 of 24 – Juliet Burke July 3, 2007

Posted by Kelsey Martineau in Lost Character Analysis.
Tags: ,
1 comment so far

Juliet Burke.  I always had issues trusting Juliet.  Even though she eventually turned out ok, you still have to wonder if she’s really going to stick with them.  I mean, sure, she wants to get off the island just like everyone, but that doesn’t mean that she didn’t lie to the survivors at first, and continue helping Ben.  I think Juliet’s attraction to Jack is because she truly believe Jack can save her, and everyone else on the island, and she likes that persistence in him.  After seeing her past, it’s hard not to feel sorry for her.  You see her sister almost die from cancer, but then everything gets turned around.  The cancer is cured, and is pregnant.  Ben claimed the cancer returned, and he could cure it if Juliet would remain on the island, but Ben’s manipulation will be covered in greater detail in his analysis.

Juliet is a very caring person, and she demonstrates this many times.  She never stopped bringing Jack food, and was quick to trust him even after he almost killed her.  That tells you a lot about a person.  It’s similar to your walk in your religious faith, if you think about it.  Being one way in your place of worship is one thing, but acting like it outside the church is something totally different.  Even after Jack threatened her, she continued to do what was right, and that tells you a lot about her personality.  You see her get so upset when her ex-husband gets hit by a bus, and dies.  Of course we all would, but it just demonstrates her caring attitude.  I think Jack made a bit of a misjudgement trusting her so fast.  In fact, that’s a little out of Jack’s personality, usually it’s the opposite.

She feared not being accepted by the survivors of the plane crash, and her assumption that they wouldn’t trust her was right.  But, I can’t blame them.  You suddenly have a person that is part of a group that has kidnapped, and attempted to kill your people, wouldn’t you have issues too?  You have to wonder if it was Jacob that cured her sister’s cancer?  I mean, obviously we know that Jacob is supernatural; some type of god apparently, so is this the case?

In studying Juliet’s character, we can learn that lying is not a good thing.  Ben manipulated and used her, attempting to convince her that she could leave if he obeyed what she did, causing her to lie many times, even to the survivors.  But, being the person that she is, she saw the wrong in what she was doing and stopped before it was to late.  I think that’s a very valuable lesson to learn.

Lost Character Personalities – Part 22 of 24 – Ethan Rom July 3, 2007

Posted by Kelsey Martineau in Lost Character Analysis.
Tags: ,
add a comment

Ethan Rom.  We didn’t get a huge chance to see much of Ethan, until we started seeing him in some flashbacks in season three.  The first thing that I think of when I hear his name now, is his persistence.  If you remember, he altered the original plan of injecting Claire, and ended up kidnapping Charlie and Claire.  That tells me right there that he is persistent in what he does and doesn’t take no for an answer.  He seems like a kind person though, aside from a few moments.  I never really understood why you would send a surgeon to investigate matters going on, especially if he’s the only one they had.

Apparently, Ethan had some sort of obsession with Claire.  This is obvious, due to the fact that he probably kidnapped Claire and Charlie without any type of approval, but that’s simply speculation.  I believe that Ethan underestimated how clever the other survivors were, eventually leading to his death.  Ethan is also very convincing, as he assisted in talking Juliet into coming to the island to join the experiments.

Lost Character Personalities – Part 21 of 24 – Mr. Eko July 2, 2007

Posted by Kelsey Martineau in Lost Character Analysis.
Tags: ,
add a comment

Mr. Eko. Eko took up the John Locke’s religious position on the island when John lost faith.  John completely stopped believing that everything on the island happened for a purpose, and Eko had a prophetic dream about this, and took up John’s place in pushing the button.  Of course, as we all know, John eventually prevents Eko from pressing it, resulting in the explosion of the hatch.  I like Eko, for the same reason I like many other characters; because he has an enormous amount of faith.  There is just something about a person with faith, you just have respect for them; and know that they are devout, and there is something different about these type people.

Eko gave the ultimate sacrifice when he was a child.  Some guerrillas attempted to force Eko’s brother, Yemi, to kill a man, to prove that he was able to do it, in an attempt to get him to join with them.  Eko, knowing his brother didn’t want to do this, stepped in and shot the man for him.  This was a very brave move, and caused the guerrillas to take Eko instead of Yemi.  It’s a sacrifice that Eko gave up, to save his brother.  Yemi became a priest, and Eko grew up with the guerrillas, eventually becoming as wretched as they were.  So you have to stop and ask yourself, is Eko wrong in this situation?  Eko sacrificed himself to save his brother, but then turned just as evil as the guerrillas were.  I don’t think so; I think that life was placed before Eko, and he ended up exactly where he was supposed to be, which was on the island.

Eko is the only person that has stood up to the smoke monster and survived.  If you watch carefully, you can see all sorts of images flashing before his eyes in the scene.  A crucifix, Jesus’ face, his brother, and  many other things.  It is quite spooky, but interesting.  Eko in his past life, became a priest after his brother was taken onto a plane that was going to be used to smuggle drugs.  That very plane crashed on the same island that Oceanic Flight 815 did, which of course, Eko was on.  Eko’s reunion with his deceased brother was an incredible scene.

What can we learn from Eko comparing his life to ours?  That faith is a very good thing.  Faith in God, which he had, as well in faith in the island.  He knew that he had to pick up where John left off.  I think there’s a huge moral to the story, and that is when your friend falls, you have to be there to pick up where he left off, and encourage him to continue.  It doesn’t mean that it will always work, but it’s inspiring isn’t it?  Eko was so persistent to push that button; it almost reminds you of Locke when he first arrived on the island.