jump to navigation

House Character Personalities – Part 3 of 6 – Dr. Eric Foreman April 29, 2008

Posted by Kelsey Martineau in House Character Analysis.
Tags: , ,
add a comment

Dr. Eric Foreman.  Yet another character that displays many qualities of House.  However, Foreman actually becomes more like him as the show progresses.  There are many subtle examples, such as the identical sneakers during one of the episodes in the first season.  Foreman eventually quits because of the fear, only to return because he got fired for performing a House-type action, then he was blacklisted.  He also admits that he has problems with his ego, particularly admitting that he’s wrong.  Sound familiar?

Not very much has been revealed about Foreman’s past.  We know his family was somewhat poor, and his parents relationship is anything but good.  He was also a thief in the past, when he was much younger, having stolen cars and robbed houses.  House reveals that this was partly the reason he hired Foreman, knowing those skills would come in handy.

He has an interesting relationship with the other members of the team.  In one episode, he stole Cameron’s article and had it published in his name.  Even though he apologized for it, it was still a terrible thing to do.  Also, at numerous occasions, he has told the other members of the team that he didn’t consider them friends, simply acquaintances, or co-workers.  Although he didn’t become extremely close to his co-workers, he at least holds family in high regard.  Foreman’s parents, particularly his father is extremely religious.  We find him in the chapel during the episode where Foreman was deathly ill.  His parents obviously care for him very much.

Even though Foreman has a shady past, he’s probably the most clever of House’s former team.  In one episode in the second season, Foreman was temporarily House’s boss, by the order of Cuddy.  Overall, Foreman respects House’s ability to diagnose patients.  We see House target Foreman with many racist-type jokes throughout the series, mostly as humor though.  Foreman’s fear of turning into House was very apparent, especially near the end of the third season.  When Foreman finally did quite, House made an attempt to keep him from leaving, although it didn’t work.  It’s obvious since Foreman returned after quitting, House respects him a lot more than before.  He tells his students to “listen” to Foreman next time, because he knows what he’s talking about (paraphrasing.)  Overall, Foreman is a great character.  Although he has problems getting close to people, he’s still a respectable guy. 

House Character Personalities – Part 2 of 6 – Dr. Robert Chase April 14, 2008

Posted by Kelsey Martineau in House Character Analysis.
Tags: , ,
add a comment

Dr. Robert Chase.  Chase is a House Jr. so to speak.  He doesn’t have quite as many “ass” type qualities though.  Although I think he has potential.  He has the ability to deduce, and not only medically.  We see him lay some of these skills down late in Season 1 and Season 2.  Chase has issues with his father, very similar to House’s and Foreman’s.  It seems like everyone has problems with their dad’s these days!  But when Chase’s father visited, it was the last time Chase would ever see him, and he didn’t even know.  His dad even told House about the problem, and asked House not to tell Chase, which surprisingly he never did.

As time passes, Chase becomes more of a supporter or House.  And, because of this, he sometimes unnaturally follows Houses orders, no matter how outrageous they may be.  I think sometimes that frustrated House, due to his tendency to desire arguements.  He was a bit sneaky, too.  He turned information regarding House over to Vogler, in order to save his own job.  Sneaky, but it’s not out of the realm of something House himself would do.  This was of course in the first season, before a relationship had really been formed between the two.  We see that when Tritter comes to Chase for information, Chase refuses to work with him.  This didn’t stop other team members from accusing him of working with Tritter though.

Overall, Chase is a good guy.  We see him become attached to Cameron when they slept together, simply because he couldn’t handle a purely “physical” relationship.  Chase is a Christian in the show, and was in Seminary before entering medschool.  This never prevents him from assisting House in morally questionable situations however.  This causes many arguements between Chase and Foreman, due to Foreman’s resentment of House.  Ultimately, House fires Chase because of an assertive comment made toward House.

House Character Personalities – Part 1 of 6 – Dr. Allison Cameron March 25, 2008

Posted by Kelsey Martineau in House Character Analysis.
Tags: , ,
add a comment

Dr. Allison Cameron.  Cameron is funny to me.  She, of course, had a thing for House, although their philosophy on life was the complete opposite.  That’s what makes their relationship so interesting.  If I had to choose one character to call the polar opposite of House, it would be Cameron.  To sum her up in three words, I’d have to say honest, idealistic, and selfless.  She hates lying to patients, regardless of whether or not it’s for the good.  She prefers to obey to proper practice of medicine, yet another contrast to House.  If you remember early in the first season, House caught her trying to manipulate her peers using information from a “How to manipulate” type book.  This tells us a lot about her insecurities as a person.  It shows you that she isn’t as confident as she sometimes comes of as.

Obviously, the relationship between Cameron and Chase would never remain simply sexual.  As Chase put it, she has a problem not getting attached to a puppy she sees on the side of the road.  We will probably never know whether or not she actually did that because of attraction, or simply to make House jealous.  Nevertheless, they are together in the show.  Cameron is the kind of person that befriends others very quickly, in my opinion.  She was totally unaware that Foreman didn’t consider her a friend, as obviously, she considered him one.  That’s one problem that comes with being selfless; people like her tend to put way too much trust in others, and assume their relationship is more than it is, and I mean that in friendship relationship terms.

Cameron reveals numerous times throughout the show that she is an atheist, but at times you see that she would like to believe that something bigger is out there.  She’s very ethical, and at times, I believe she has trouble thinking that the strong ethical standpoint she has was 100% natural.  That’s never revealed in the show, just an opinion. 

House makes a great point that there’s no logical reason that she would be a Doctor.  He deduces that she’s damaged, which is later revealed to be true.  He also believes this is the main reason she is attracted to him, and he’s a “sick” puppy that needs to be nurtured back to good health.  This makes perfect sense when in the third season, after House’s leg is temporarily healed, she refuses to go out for a drink with him.  So what did Cameron see in House?  If you remember, in the first season I believe, she asks him at one point if he likes her, and he says no bluntly.  That’s pretty harsh, but what else can you expect from him?  She wanted to feel special, obviously.  She wanted someone that didn’t like anyone on earth (House) to give her the hard, cold, truth about his feelings.  I guess it was more of an acceptance thing than anything else.  It’s probably the main reason she likes him so much.  She even said once, that it’s because he’s brash, brutally honest, and even mean.  What can we learn from Cameron?  That it’s hard to be a completely selfless person, because sometimes you get walked on.  I’m not saying we shouldn’t, but it just shows you how bad the rest of the world is.  Instead of getting treated great in return, you get walked on.  Not that Cameron gets walked all over, but I think you see my point.  Good people don’t always get equal treatment back.

House Analysis March 14, 2008

Posted by Kelsey Martineau in House Character Analysis.
Tags: , ,
2 comments

A character analysis of the fictional characters from the show, “House, M.D.” is coming soon.  As I see every day, my “Lost Character Analysis” gets far more traffic than the rest of my blog.  Although my blogging is not really see how many users I can get to read, I like to keep the readers happy.  I used to do it only for me as a private, password-protected blog.  But, one day I changed that, and noticed a fair amount of readers.  Consequently, now, I blog not only for, myself, but also, you, the reader.

So, within the next couple of months, I’ll analyze (to the best of my ability) the characters, in this order:

1) Dr. Allison Cameron
2) Dr. Robert Chase
3) Dr. Eric Foreman
4) Dr. Lisa Cuddy
5) Dr. James Wilson
6) Dr. Gregory House

I know that Cameron and Chase are no longer regulars on the show, however, whether they come back or not, it will prove to be an interesting analysis.

Keep an eye open for the first one late March!  Thanks for reading.

Kelsey

Thoughts 3/13/2008 March 13, 2008

Posted by Kelsey Martineau in Psychology, Religion, Sociology.
Tags: , ,
2 comments

*Question by Wasim*

Does money really make people happy? I mean materially it obviously does but ACTUAL money surely doesn’t. Or does it ?

That’s an excellent question.  I know it helps to an extent to have money.  Here is my personal thoughts on it though.  I believe that kids that grow up with tons of money wouldn’t appreciate it as much as someone that either earns it or gets rich, specifically lower class to middle class people, simply because they understand the value of it, and know what it’s like to not have anything they want.  People often get confused about the scripture in the bible 1 Timothy 6:10, which (paraphrasing) states that the love of money is the root of all evil.  Probably 95% of people have a misconception that money itself is the root of evil, according to that scripture.

Can it make you happy?  That comes down to the person, I believe.  Everyone thinks about being filthy rich, and thinks that it will solve all your problems, and I’m not saying it won’t, but let’s think about this.  Let’s say you are a depressed person, with many problems.  Maybe buying stuff fulfills a temporary need that you have for material possessions.  Let’s add ten million dollars to you and your problem.  You’re going to be able to buy whatever you want, and sure you will be temporarily satisfied, until you have exhausted every “want” that you have.  That’s why in the long-run, money doesn’t make you happy.  What does?  I don’t really know the answer to that, but when I find out, I’ll let you know.

Thoughts 2/28/2008 February 28, 2008

Posted by Kelsey Martineau in Religion.
Tags:
1 comment so far

What’s the definition of faith?  Not a dictionary definition, but from a religious person’s point of view?  I think faith is, more or less, believing in something that has a dice roll’s chance of being real or not.  Of course, you’re probably thinking, “What is this, a state the obvious contest, Kelsey?”  But seriously, think about it.  The word “faith” is tied into Christianity far more than any other religion, and in my opinion, it’s because Christianity is one of the few (not the only, mind you) religions based on a deity that no one has seen, aside from Jesus of course.  I realize that Jesus walked and talked, and I’m not denying that, but the whole trinity thing, God the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, are sometimes seen as separate entities.  That’s a whole different discussion though, that I’m not even going to get into. 

Think about Buddhism, of course there was Buddha, and Islam had Muhammad.  Depending on your point-of-view, one could say that Jesus didn’t technically start Christianity.  Sure, he showed us the way, and claimed to be the son of God, but what about the followers of God before Jesus?  Judaism, right?  Well, what’s the main difference between believing in God before Jesus and after?  The only reason Judaism exists along with Christianity is because the Jews chose not to believe that Jesus truly was the son of God.  A little off topic, which I tend to do, but I think you get my point.

So, back to the faith argument?  A lot of people say “You have faith in that chair you’re about to sit in.  You believe that it’s going to hold you up.”  Very true, but also I know the foundation of that chair.  I know it’s strong enough to support me, and I also know that I have probably sat in that chair, or a similar one before.  That’s where the whole problem with faith comes in for me, at times.  I can have a relationship with my dad or mom, and love them, because I can see and touch them, but it’s hard to have a relationship with a being that is non-existent.  However, isn’t it funny, that a lot of iffy believers like to blame God when things aren’t going well, even though they see-saw back and forth on the fact that He even exists?  I’m not pointing fingers, I’ve done that.  Everyone has.  I believe that’s what is so attractive about Deism sometimes, it gives individuals that want to believe in God the right to say, God had nothing to do with this, whether it was good or not.

Thoughts 2/20/2008 February 20, 2008

Posted by Kelsey Martineau in Politics, Sociology.
Tags: ,
add a comment

*Question by Lindsay*

The suggested topic was: 

So I was informed in my behavioral ecology class today, that Genetically engineered (cloned) beef, pork, and goat are now USDA approved to sell the public…. the clincher being that NO labels are required to indicate if the meat is cloned or not. Thoughts?

Hmm.  Now that’s interesting.  When it comes down to it, I don’t have a major problem with it.  But, I also wonder what cloning actually does to the DNA.  I’m not a scientist, so I can’t really comment on that.  If this is perfected though, I think this could be a way to end a lot of hunger, as well as end extinction of certain animals.  The more I think about it though, I guess it would be nice to have a small stamp or something letting you know you’re eating meat from a cloned animal.  I think the reason they don’t want to do that, is because in all reality it would probably freak a lot of people out.  I dunno, tough call there.  What about cloning humans?  Off topic, sure, but is it wrong?  I’ve noticed a pattern here.  Females generally say it’s wrong, and males generally say it’s right.  I’m not saying this is ALWAYS the case, I’m just generalizing.  I believe in stem-cells research.  Why not?  If I lose my heart, and have the opportunity to use an identical one, why not?  I think the reason women see it as more of an issue is because they can become more emotionally attached to someone or something than men, and again, I’m just generalizing.   What do you think?

Thoughts 1/23/2008 January 23, 2008

Posted by Kelsey Martineau in Philosophy, Religion.
Tags: ,
4 comments

I guess the biggest question in Philosophy as a whole, to me anyway, is ”Why are we here?”  There is no factual answer to that in my opinion.  You ask followers of the Christian faith, they are going to say to bring people closer to Jesus.  Ask a follower of Islam?  To serve Allah, and “cleanse the impure.”  I could go on and on with tons of other religions, but I think you get my point.  Even scientists and evolutionists come into play here.  They believe we’re here to “reproduce” and keep the earth populated.  I believe this is one topic that links Philosophy and Religion.  Although some  are similar, almost every single religion has a different doctrine of belief, regarding the “purpose” of life.

Well, my question is, why isn’t there a universal reason?  There has to be.  I have got to be on this earth for more than merely to reproduce.  I can’t and won’t buy that theory.  Why is life what we perceive it to be?  Does that make sense?  The human race as a whole labels human beings the standard.  That’s one reason that generally, when you see an alien movie, they are in humanoid form.  What we are, on this small planet compared to the rest of the universe, is our perception of the “standard.”  That brings up the “perception is reality” topic.  That theory is completely and totally wrong in my opinion.  Want a perfect example?  The center of our solar system is what?  The sun, right?  What does it appear from our point-of-view (perception)?  The earth.  So, are we deceived?  Not necessarily, but from our point of view, what we know to be reality is in fact, not reality.  So, if we are deceived by something such as the sun, why not life itself?  I’m going out on a limb here, but bear with me.  Why do we think life as we see it is all there is?  No one can tell me with factual evidence that our perception of what we call reality isn’t deceiving us.  Well, the most common argument with this will be, “Well, we have solid proof that we revolve around the sun.”  Very true, but it took ages to discover that did it not?  Perhaps it takes even longer to prove what reality truly is?

Thoughts 1/16/2008 January 16, 2008

Posted by Kelsey Martineau in Politics, Sociology.
Tags: ,
2 comments

I was browsing a struggling secular musical artist’s profile a second ago and it hit me.  Deep down, that’s what everyone wants.  Not particularly to be a secular artist, but to have recognition, to be important.  Why do you think so many inventions are thought up, theories, great discoveries?  One could argue that it’s because most people want to better the human race, because they have duty, humanity, etc… But I don’t think so.  In fact, I’m almost certain that’s not it.  When you get down to it, they want recognition.  Don’t get me wrong, there have been a lot of great minds that were selfless, thinking of others before themselves, and truly wanting to help.  But when it comes down to it, most people are just like that struggling musical artist I was talking about.  They want to get rich, famous, make tons of money, and live what most people refer to as the “American dream.”  I’m really not a fan of that terminology, simply because that’s why most other countries despise America.  One of the many reasons.  What’s another you may ask?  Well, have you been to a buffet lately?  The enormous amounts of food that is put out for gluttonous citizens.  Don’t mistake me for complaining though.  We are capitalistic, and we have earned that right.  It’s just funny to me that so many stupid people wonder why we’re despised.  And of course, it  comes down to more than just food, etc… but I won’t get into that.

It still shocks me day by day to see the steady decline of our civilization.  America is Rome, people.  If you can’t see it, go read your history books.  The main thing that gets me is the immorality that has escalated to the extreme in the last fifty years.   We, just as the Romans, started off pure.  However as time went on, more and more became acceptable.  To be honest, I think a lot of that has to do with the fact that they always needed more and more and more.  Does that makes sense?  Individuals high on the chain of command, bureaucrats, etc… get whatever they want, and this is more-so true in Roman times than now, but even so.  What I mean is, sure, they started off with a woman, then it got boring, two women, three women, let’s add a man, a child, two children, etc…  You see where I’m going.  That’s an example of what’s going on with our civilization as a whole.  Pornography is one example.  There are some wretched things out there, and that’s directly caused by the desire for more more more in my opinion.

Thoughts 11/16/2007 November 16, 2007

Posted by Kelsey Martineau in Psychology, Religion.
Tags: ,
6 comments

“Evil gains work their punishment.”

My friend Ethan introduced me to this quote by Sophocles, and I absolutely love it.  Have you ever read one of those quotes, that the moment you read it, it hit you like a sledgehammer?  The ironic thing is, the time in my life when I heard it, back in June, was the exact appropriate timing.  No matter how you look at that phrase, it works.  Regardless of what happens, an evil deed never goes unpaid.  I’m sure a lot of people will interpret that as a biblical phrase, but that’s not exactly what I mean.  Guilt plays a big part in people’s lives.  I’ll tell you something I’ve noticed about people, and I’ve seen it over and over again.  People, when committing acts that are wrong, immoral, etc… seek justification over everything.  Humans do things to appease that inner-feeling of guilt and remorse.   It’s almost like, even if a person has deceived themselves into believing something, they can sleep at night.  That isn’t really how the world works. When one feels as he/she has committed wrongful acts, they may justify it in different ways.  Removing religious symbols, talking about God or their chosen deity less, because they feel guilt and remorse, or claiming that when they feel like they pray, their prayers “don’t get passed the ceiling.”  If you believe in Christianity, it goes back to the very first story in the bible, when Adam hid from God in the forest.  We just do it much more subtly.

Isn’t it incredible how much emotion plays a part in our life?  Emotion is probably the number one misconception when dealing with destiny.  This isn’t the first time I’ve mentioned this in a post, but we’ll analyze it a little deeper.  I don’t think the majority of people understand how humans are.  There are so many factors that cause us to feel “attached” to a person, and we misconceive that feeling for destiny.  The truth is, women do it more than men.  Out of all my friends, in probably about a 70/30 mix between male/female, about 20% of the guys believe in destiny, and every single one of the girls believe in it.  The definition of destiny or fate in my opinion is a way to explain a mistake.  Perfect example 1: Girl gets pregnant, girl wants to believe this was fate, girl attempts to force relationship.  To her, it has to be “destiny” Perfect example 2: Someone gets fired due to a mishap at work.  They hear of another “excellent” job that’s open, and before they get the job, they assume that they’ll have it and it was “meant to be”  That’s just a couple of examples, but you get the picture.  Example 1 is probably the most common.

Girls tend to believe in destiny much more than guys.  Probably due to the fact that they are all emotional to an extreme.  We can’t admit mistakes.  That’s the problem here.  No one wants to accept the fact that they’ve screwed up, so what do we do?  Pawn it off on either Fate/Destiny, or God.  Me personally, I don’t know what to believe about a lot of things any more.  That’s part of the reason I chose this topic today.